Author:
Yusoff Mazirah,McLeay Fraser,Woodruffe-Burton Helen
Abstract
Purpose
– This study aims to identify the dimensions of business student satisfaction in the Malaysian private higher educational environment and evaluate the influence that demographic factors have on satisfaction.
Design/methodology/approach
– A questionnaire was developed and distributed to 1,200 undergraduate business students at four private higher educational (PHE) institutions in Malaysia. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify the underlying dimensions that drive student satisfaction. ANOVA and t-tests were conducted to evaluate the influence that demographic factors have on the results.
Findings
– Factor analysis resulted in the adoption of a 12-factor solution from an original set of 53 satisfaction items. The results also indicated the influence of demographic factors on the level of business student satisfaction.
Originality/value
– This study identified 12 factors or the underlying dimensions that drive business student satisfaction in the Malaysian PHE. The 12 factors are: professional comfortable environment; student assessments and learning experiences; classroom environment; lecture and tutorial facilitating goods; textbook and tuition fees; student support facilities; business procedures; relationship with teaching staff; knowledgeable and responsive faculty; staff helpfulness; feedback; and class sizes. Understanding these factors could help educational institutions to better plan their strategies and inform academics interested in studying student satisfaction.
Reference76 articles.
1. Aitken, N.
(1982), “College student performance, satisfaction, and retention: specification and estimation of a structural model”,
Journal of Higher Education
, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 32-50.
2. Alves, H.
and
Raposo, M.
(2009), “The measurement of the construct satisfaction in higher education”,
The Services Industries Journal
, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 203-218.
3. Alves, H.
and
Raposo, M.
(2010), “The influence of university image on students behaviour”,
International Journal of Educational Management
, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 73-85.
4. Appleton-Knapp, S.L.
and
Krentler, K.A.
(2006), “Measuring student expectations and their effects on satisfaction: the importance of managing student expectations”,
Journal of Marketing Education
, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 254-264.
5. Arambewela, R.
and
Hall, J.
(2009), “An empirical model of international student satisfaction”,
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing
, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 555-569.
Cited by
76 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献