Evaluation of Spanish institutional repositories based on criteria related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel

Author:

Serrano-Vicente Rocio,Melero Remedios,Abadal Ernest

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide, through a set of indicators, an overview of the way in which Spanish institutional repositories are run and the services they offer their respective institutions and other users. The selected descriptors are based on aspects related to technology, procedures, content, marketing and the personnel responsible for managing repositories. Design/methodology/approach In order to establish the indicators, a thorough review of the literature was carried out to identify existing indicators that are used to assess repositories. These were divided into five categories (technology, procedures, content, marketing and personnel) with a total of 48 components. An online survey was conducted with the repositories managers of 66 Spanish research institutions in order to verify the degree of fulfilment of the selected indicators. Findings The survey received forty-six responses, which represented a response rate of 69 per cent. Of these, 44 came from universities and two from research centres. In total, 65 per cent of the repositories have the capacity to import data from and export data to other university systems, mainly Current Research Information System (32 per cent). Most repositories have mechanisms for the large-scale import and export of metadata and digital objects (83 per cent). The use of altmetrics in repositories is widespread (44 per cent). Authors and librarians deposit most frequently (37 and 32 per cent, respectively), in spite of the fact that 44 per cent do not have full-time staff working in the repository. In more than 80 per cent of the repositories, between 90 and 100 per cent of the deposits are full-text documents. With respect to the tools used to promote the repository within the institution, these are primarily face-to-face training sessions (82 per cent), followed by support materials such as manuals and help pages (65 per cent). The academic authorities encourage open access among researchers in 56 per cent of cases, a significant element in repository marketing. Originality/value This work proposes a model based on five dimensions and 48 indicators to assess institutional repositories. This approach has been applied to Spanish institutional repositories to provide up-to-date information about their management procedures and promotional methods and the services they offer authors and the university community. This overview of Spanish repositories has provided an insight into the way in which repositories have evolved in recent years and allowed potential improvements to be identified based on the most advanced repositories. This model can also be exported to assess institutional repositories in other countries.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference32 articles.

1. Barrueco, J.M., Caballos, A., Campos, Á., Casàldiga, N., Combarro, P., Cívico, R., Domènech, L., García, M.A., Losada, M. and Morillo, J.C. (2010), “Guía para la evaluación de repositorios institucionales de investigación”, available at: http://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/35735 (accessed 15 July 2018).

2. Barrueco-Cruz, J.M. et al. (2014), “Guía para la evaluación de repositorios institucionales de investigación”, RECOLECTA, FECYT–CRUE–REBIUN, available at: www.recolecta.fecyt.es/sites/default/files/contenido/documentos/GuiaEvaluacionRecolecta_v.ok_0.pdf

3. Bruns, T. and Inefuku, H.W. (2016), “Purposeful metrics: matching institutional repository metrics to purpose and audience”, Making institutional Repositories Work, Purdue University Press, pp. 213-234.

4. Size isn’t everything. Sustainable repositories as evidenced by sustainable deposit profiles;D-Lib Magazine,2007

5. El acceso abierto en las universidades españolas: estado de la cuestión y propuestas de mejora;MEI,2013

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3