Abstract
Purpose
The paper aims to examine the role of human greed in the determination of executive remuneration in the UK.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper reviews the past and existing regulation and corporate governance recommendations on executive remuneration.
Findings
The paper demonstrates that the failure of regulatory mechanisms to curb excessive executive remuneration can be justified on the grounds of human greed. Greed is facilitated by the potential conflict of interest that exists as a result of the executives’ position in the company. The position of the law has given greed the opportunity to manifest, making it quite difficult for executive remuneration to be effectively regulated.
Originality/value
The paper adds to the existing debate on excessive executive remuneration by demonstrating that human greed is the basis of excessive executive remuneration on which limited literature exists.
Subject
Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference83 articles.
1. Peer choice in CEO compensation;Journal of Financial Economics,2013
2. Corporate governance, compensation consultants, and CEO pay levels;Review of Accounting Studies,2012
3. Remarks on say on pay: an unjustified incursion on director authority,2008
4. Theresa May’s plan to put workers on board is borrowed from Germany and France,2016
5. The impact of say-on-pay on executive compensation;Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,2016
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献