The effects of risk-reducing strategies on consumer perceived risk and on purchase likelihood

Author:

Yeung Ruth,Yee Wallace,Morris Joe

Abstract

Purpose – Consumer perception of risk and its impacts on purchasing behaviour are critical aspects of food safety. Consumer risk management strategies influence, and respond to, the risk management strategies adopted by the food industry. This research, using poultry product as the focus, aims to identify the consumer risk-reducing strategies and their impact on perception of food safety-related risk and then on purchase behaviour. Design/methodology/approach – By adopting a quantitative research paradigm with a quota sample of 200 respondents, a Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) model was built to assess the direct and indirect effects of strategies taken by consumers to reduce perceived risk and the consequences for purchase likelihood, utilising LISREL 8.30. Findings – The research reveals brand, information and quality assurance as influential risk-reducing strategies to reduce consumer perception of food safety risk and subsequently to facilitate purchase likelihood during a period concerned about microbiological contamination in chicken meat. Practical implications – The results provide guidance of both proactive and remedial actions that the food industry can follow and also help to evaluate the effectiveness of its marketing activities. Originality/value – The research provides an insight in assisting government agencies and the food industry to develop appropriate food-related risk management strategies to serve the interests of both consumers and producers.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference99 articles.

1. Agrawal, M. (1995), “Warning labels: the role of expertise and perceived risk in pharmaceutical purchase behaviour”, Health Marketing Quarterly , Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 99-108.

2. Alba, J. and Hutchinson, J.W. (2000), “Knowledge calibration: what consumers know and what they think they know”, Journal of Consumer Research , Vol. 27, pp. 123-56.

3. Anderson, W. (1999), “Risk analysis: fear, perception and reality”, Royal Irish Academy, Food Safety Authority of Ireland, Dublin, available at www.fsai.ie/fsai_papers/210499.htm.

4. Arndt, J. (1967), “Word of mouth advertising and information communications”, in Cox, D. (Ed.), Risk Taking & Information Handling in Consumer Behavior , Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, MA, pp. 188-239.

5. Bauer, R.A. (1967), “Consumer behaviour as risk taking”, in Cox, D.F. (Ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior , Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, MA, pp. 23-33.

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3