Measuring performance in policy advice output: Australian developments

Author:

Di Francesco Michael

Abstract

This paper is based on work undertaken for the Commonwealth Department of Finance and Administration and reports on recent developments within the Australian public sector of performance measurement in policy advice output. It outlines the role of performance information in an accrual‐based outcomes and outputs management framework, examines the merits of a model for developing criteria for “good” performance information and explores how these design principles might be applied to policy advice output. The paper identifies the key attributes of policy advice output from the perspective of both providers and clients and their linkage to proposed performance indicators, and concludes by surveying the political and accountability problems associated with specifying and measuring policy advice in government.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference18 articles.

1. ANAO and DoF (Australian National Audit Office and Department of Finance) (1996), Performance Information Principles, ANAO, Canberra.

2. ACT (Australian Capital Territory) Financial Management Reform Unit (1995), Outputs and Output Classes: Guidelines for the ACT, ACT Chief Minister’s Department, Canberra.

3. ACT Chief Minister’s Department (1998), ACT Government Policy Performance Measures, Chief Minister’s Department, Canberra.

4. Bakvis, H. (1997), “Advising the executive: think tanks, consultants, political staff and kitchen cabinets”, in Weller, P., Bakvis, H. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (Eds), The Hollow Crown: Countervailing Trends in Core Executives, Macmillan, London, pp. 84‐125.

5. Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J. and Walsh, P. (1996), Public Management: The New Zealand Model, Oxford University Press, Auckland.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3