Author:
Kroll Alexander,Proeller Isabella
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this article is to improve understanding of the use of performance information in the public sector.
Design/methodology/approach
– The article is based on a comparative case study in the field of German childcare administration. Two cities have been selected based on the variation of their performance measurement systems.
Findings
– It is found that a higher complexity and sophistication of the measurement system fosters the use of performance data by civil servants. At the same time, such a comprehensive control system seems to undermine the steering ability of local politicians. Referring to agency theory, it is argued that complex data systems can increase information asymmetries in favour of bureaucrats.
Research limitations/implications
– Since the findings are based on two cases, the paper does not make any claims about their generalisability for a particular population. Instead, the paper uses in-depth observations to better inform and enhance an existing hypothesis.
Practical implications
– The results emphasise the importance of user-specific performance reporting. The paper suggests thinking of the adoption of management innovation as a temporal process where measurement complexity can be balanced over time by customised reporting.
Originality/value
– This article is innovative as it focuses on two user groups of performance data simultaneously. The results show that this approach adds value because observations vary based on the perspective of the different users.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference41 articles.
1. Anheier, H.
and
Seibel, W.
(2001), The Nonprofit Sector in Germany, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
2. Arrow, K.
(1984), “The economics of agency”, in
Pratt, J.
and
Zeckhauser, R.
(Eds), The Economics of Agency, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, pp. 37-51.
3. Askim, J.
(2009), “The demand side of performance measurement: explaining councillors' utilization of performance information in policymaking”, International Public Management Journal, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 24-47.
4. Askim, J.
,
Johnsen, A.
and
Christophersen, K.-A.
(2008), “Factors behind organizational learning from benchmarking: experiences from Norwegian municipal benchmarking networks”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 297-320.
5. Barzelay, M.
and
Shvets, E.
(2006), “Innovating government-wide public management practices to implement development policy: the case of ‘Brazil in Action’”, International Public Management Journal, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 47-74.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献