Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to contribute to extant literature by linking principal empowering leadership to teachers’ innovative work behavior. By doing so, the author attempts to provide a more nuanced understanding of this relationship by examining a moderated mediation model which encompasses exploration as a mediator and role conflict as a moderator.
Design/methodology/approach
– Data were collected from 201 public teachers. In order to examine the present hypotheses bootstrapping analysis, Sobel test and SPSS macro were used.
Findings
– The results demonstrated that teacher exploration mediates the relationship between empowering leadership and innovative work behavior and, further, that this indirect effect is contingent on role conflict.
Practical implications
– Based on the present findings, in order to enhance innovation, schools need to promote both empowering leadership style and their teachers’ exploration. Moreover, principals should refrain from providing conflicting orders and expectations from their teachers because such conditions will eliminate the positive effect of their empowering behaviors on teachers’ exploration and innovative work behavior.
Originality/value
– This is the first study that develops and tests a moderated mediation model regarding the relationship between principal empowering leadership and teacher innovative behavior.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education
Reference68 articles.
1. Ahearne, M.
,
Mathieu, J.
and
Rapp, A.
(2005), “To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance”,
Journal of Applied Psychology
, Vol. 90 No. 5, pp. 945-955.
2. Aiken, L.S.
and
West, S.G.
(1991),
Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
3. Amabile, T.M.
(1996),
Creativity in Context
, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
4. Baron, R.M.
and
Kenny, D.A.
(1986), “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
, Vol. 51 No. 6, pp. 1173-1182.
5. Beauchamp, M.R.
and
Bray, S.R.
(2001), “Role ambiguity and role conflict within interdependent teams”,
Small Group Research
, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 133-157.
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献