Author:
Ameyaw Ernest Effah,Chan Albert P.C.,Owusu-Manu De-Graft,Coleman Ekow
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to identify and then evaluate perceived risk factors influencing variability between contract sum and final count, and to develop a fuzzy risk assessment model for evaluating the overall impact of established critical risk factors impacting on variability between contract sum and final account in government-funded construction projects. Construction projects are characterised by risk factors that significantly impact on variability between the contract sum and final account.
Design/methodology/approach
– A research approach integrating questionnaire survey, mean scoring ranking and principal component factor analysis (PCFA) methods was adopted to evaluate and classify the critical risk factors. A fuzzy synthetic evaluation method was sequentially applied to compute the overall risk impact (ORI) of eight critical risk factors’ impact on variability between contract sum and final account.
Findings
– Initial results showed that eight critical risk factors have high impact on variations between contract sum and final account, namely (in order): project funding problems, underestimation of quantities, variations by client, change in scope of works, inadequate specification, change in design by client, defects in design and unexpected site (ground) conditions. PCFA produced two factor solutions: “professional-related factors” and “client factors”. The fuzzy model further showed that the ORI is 5.48, indicating that these risk factors have a high impact on variability between contract sum and final account in public construction projects. The client factors have a very high impact (5.59), while the professional-related factors indicated a high impact (5.41) on project cost variability.
Originality/value
– A practical model is proposed to evaluate the key risks associated with cost overruns in public projects. By giving effective and sustained attention to these factors, variability between contract sum and final account, a common situation in Ghana, can be controlled to achieve cost savings in public infrastructure projects.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference69 articles.
1. Alarcón, L.F.
and
Mardones, D.A.
(1998),
Improving the Design Construction Interface
, Proceedings IGLC-6, Sao Paulo.
2. Al-Bahar, J.F.
and
Crandall, K.C.
(1990), “Systematic risk management approach for construction projects”,
Construction Engineering and Management
, Vol. 116 No. 3, pp. 533-546.
3. Al-Hammad, A.
,
Assaf, S.
and
Al-Shibah, M.
(1997), “The effect of faulty design on building Maintenance”,
Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering
, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 29-39.
4. Al-Momani, A.H.
(2000), “Construction delay: a quantitative analysis”,
International Journal of Project Management
, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 51-59.
5. Ameyaw, E.E.
and
Chan, A.P.C.
(2013), “Private sector’s involvement in the water industry of Ghana”,
Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology
, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 251-275.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献