Author:
Zhang Juan,Gao Xi,Hong Xi,Coates Hamish
Abstract
Purpose
Although doctoral education has experienced substantial development in recent decades, it remains an elite, hence fragile, dimension of university policy and practice. This study aims to articulate perspectives to guide the next phase of strengthening and growth.
Design/methodology/approach
Working from theoretical and empirical research conducted in China, including scholarship on workforce ecosystems, education design and the student experience, this study contributes a framework with qualitative insights which clarify the goals and experiences of doctoral education in ways that will render it more relevant, effective and contributing.
Findings
The paper identifies areas for doctoral reform to ensure career readiness, including three distinctive outcomes and four indispensable experiences.
Originality/value
This study advances a doctoral design framework which can render transparent the substance of programs and prompt program coordinators to develop and ensure career relevance.
Reference55 articles.
1. The fourth age of research;Nature,2013
2. Illuminating the liminality of the doctoral journey: precarity, agency and COVID-19;Higher Education Research and Development,2021
3. Antecedents and outcomes: theories of fit and the study of doctoral education;Studies in Higher Education,2015
4. Research on the target orientation of academic doctoral students' training and their quality structure;Educational Science,2015
5. From product to process. The reform of doctoral education in Europe and China;Studies in Higher Education,2018