Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief and partial overview of some of the issues and authors that have dominated British industrial relations research since 1965. It is cast in terms of that year being the astronomical Big Bang from which all else was created. It traces a spectacular growth in academic interest and departments throughout the 1970s and 1980s, and then comments on the petering out of the tradition and its very existence (Darlington, 2009; Smith, 2011).
Design/methodology/approach
– There are no methods other than a biased look through the literature.
Findings
– These show a liberal oppression of the Marxist interpretation of class struggle through trade unions, collective bargaining, strikes, and public policy. At first through the Cold War and later, less well because many Marxists survived and thrived in industrial relations departments until after 2000, through closing courses and choking off demand. This essay exposes the hypocrisy surrounding notions of academic freedom, and throws light on the determination of those in the labour movement and their academic allies to push forward wage controls and stunted bargaining regimes, alongside restrictions on strikes, in the name of moderation and the middle ground.
Originality/value
– An attempt to correct the history as written by the pro tem victors.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference115 articles.
1. ACAS
(1980),
Industrial Relations Handbook
, HMSO, London.
2. Ackers, P.
(2007), “Collective bargaining as industrial democracy: Hugh Clegg and the political foundations of British industrial relations pluralism”,
British Journal of Industrial Relations
, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 77-101.
3. Ackers, P.
(2011), “The changing systems of British industrial relations, 1954-1979: Hugh Clegg and the Warwick sociological turn”,
British Journal of Industrial Relations
, Vol. 49 No. 2, pp. 306-330.
4. Ackers, P.
(2014), “Game changer: Hugh Clegg’s role in drafting the 1968 Donovan report and redefining the British industrial relations policy-problem”,
Historical Studies in Industrial Relations
, No. 35, pp. 63-88.
5. Ackers, P.
and
Wilkinson, A.
(2003),
Understanding Work and Employment: Industrial Relations in Transition
, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献