Power in the principalship: four women’s experiences

Author:

Fennell Hope‐Arlene

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore four women principals’ experiences with power in the course of their daily leadership. The data used in this exploration was collected through in‐depth interviews, conducted from a phenomenological perspective, during the second and third years of a three‐year study on the leadership experiences of the four principals. The thematic findings which emerged from this data included empowerment, positive power, traditional power and negative power, and are discussed in relation to three lenses of power: dominance or “power over”, facilitation or “power through”, and as energy and competence or “power with”. The four principals’ experiences were remarkable in that they were extensively engaged in interpreting, experiencing and using power as “power through” and “power with” rather than as “power over”. The findings from this research serve as examples of ways in which power is enacted by women leaders within traditional organizational settings, and the potential of their actions to positively transform school organizations and the experiences of those who work within them.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Administration,Education

Reference41 articles.

1. Abbott, M. and Caracheo, F. (1988), “Power, authority and bureaucracy”, in Boyan, N. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Administration, Longman, New York, NY.

2. Acker, S. (1995), “Gender and teachers’ work”, in Apple, M. (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, Vol. 21, pp. 99‐162.

3. Blackmore, J. (1989), “Educational leadership: a feminist critique and reconstruction”, in Smyth, J. (Ed.), Critical Perspectives in Educational Leadership, The Falmer Press, New York, NY, pp. 93‐131.

4. Blase, J. and Anderson, G. (1995), The Micro Politics of Educational Leadership, Teachers College Press, New York, NY.

5. Bogdan, R. and Biklen, S. (1982), Qualitative Research for Education, Allen > Bacon, London.

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3