Factors that influence the use of library resources by faculty members

Author:

Korobili Stella,Tilikidou Irene,Delistavrou Antonia

Abstract

PurposeTo examine the use of library resources, focusing on e‐sources, by the members of the faculty of a higher educational institute in Thessaloniki, Greece; to reveal the factors which influence the effective use of sources for academic duties; and to provide reliable information to both the administration and the library of the institute, with the aim of the improvement of library services.Design/methodology/approachA census survey, using a structured questionnaire, among the faculty of the Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki was conducted to examine the frequency of use of resources, mainly e‐sources, and to reveal the impact of demographic or academic situational characteristics, the assumed positive influence of academic productivity, perceived usefulness of resources and access to e‐sources on the use of e‐sources as well as the assumed negative influence of barriers and computer anxiety on the use of e‐sources.FindingsThe great majority of the faculty of TEI uses printed sources more than e‐sources, but they also use e‐sources quite frequently. Use is mostly of books, websites and printed journals. It was also found that the use of e‐sources is higher in the School of Business Administration and Economics among those who hold a PhD degree and among younger members of the faculty. Also, the results indicated that the use of e‐sources is positively influenced by the respondents' perceived usefulness of resources, the convenience of access to the sources and their academic productivity. The examination of the computer anxiety rating scale (CARS) provided evidence that the less anxious the faculty feel about PCs, the more frequent users they become.Research limitations/implicationsFurther research is needed to measure how faculty interact with information, what kind of electronic sources they prefer, what search strategies they use, as well as whether their information needs are satisfied. This research needs to be duplicated to other universities in Greece to determine whether the results can be generalized for Greek academic faculty.Practical implicationsUniversity administrations need to improve library facilities, to include more workstations for access to electronic sources, as well as to improve the marketing and communication of these e‐sources.Originality/valueThis research tries to fill a gap in the literature, which has underemphasized so far the need for assessing and measuring the use of library resources in Greek academic libraries and the examination of the factors that influence this use.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference34 articles.

1. Abels, E.G.Liebscher, P.Denman, D.W. (1996), “Factors that influence the use of electronic networks and network services by science and engineering faculty in small universities and colleges”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol.47, pp.146‐58

2. Adika, G. (2003), “Internet use among faculty members of universities in Ghana”, Library Review, Vol.52, 1 pp.29‐37

3. Ajayi, A.Olatokun, W.M.Tiamiyu, M.A. (2001), “Computer anxiety, phobia, obsession and work stress at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria: Part 1 – prevalence and correlates”, African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, Vol.11, 2 pp.125‐38

4. American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy (1998), “A progress report on information literacy: an update on the American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: final report”, available at: www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/whitepapers/whitepapersreports.htm [5 April 2002] (accessed 28 November 2005)

5. Anderson, A.A. (1996), “Predictors of computer anxiety and performance in information systems”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.12, 1 pp.61‐77

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3