Author:
Bosch Arnold,Volker Leentje,Koutamanis Alexander
Abstract
Purpose
– The use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in the Netherlands is increasing. Studies show that BIM is mainly used in the lifecycle stages of initiation, development and realisation. Owners and operators are presumably yet to discover the added value of BIM for maintenance and information management within their organisations. The purpose of this paper is to investigate information management during the operations stage from the viewpoint of owners and determines the added value of BIM within this growing field of construction.
Design/methodology/approach
– This research is based on a literature review, explorative interviews and process modelling. In total, 21 semi-structured interviews were conducted among public real estate and infrastructure owners and operators, software companies, service providers and contractors.
Findings
– This paper provides empirical insights into the sources of inefficiency and ineffectiveness in the activities of Dutch semi-public and public clients. It finds that the current added value of BIM in the operations stage is marginal. The main reasons for this are a lack of alignment between the supply of and demand for information and the context-dependent role of information.
Practical implications
– The authors propose a structured approach that supports client organisations in establishing greater alignment between the supply of and demand for information, and a less context-dependent role for information during the operations stage.
Originality/value
– In contrast to previous studies, this paper offers a new perspective on BIM in the operations stage, a growing field of interest in practice and science.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference32 articles.
1. Anderson, A.
,
Marsters, A.
,
Dossick, C.
and
Neff, G.
(2012), “Construction to operations exchange: challenges of implementing COBie and BIM in a Large Owner Organization”, Construction Research Congress 2012, pp. 688-697, doi: 10.1061/9780784412329.070.
2. Becerik-Gerber, B.
,
Jazizadeh, F.
,
Li, N.
and
Calis, G.
(2012), “Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management”,
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
, Vol. 138 No. 3, pp. 431-442.
3. Bosch, A.
(2014), “Beheren 2.0: het beheren van bouwwerken met BIM (Managing building 2.0: managing and operating buildings with BIM)”, masters’ thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft.
4. British Standards Institution
(2008),
PAS55
, BSI, London.
5. Bryde, D.
,
Broquetas, M.
and
Volm, J.
(2013), “The project benefits of building information modeling (BIM)”,
International Journal of Project Management
, Vol. 31 No. 7, pp. 971-980.
Cited by
65 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献