Author:
Zwickle Adam,M. Koontz Tomas,M. Slagle Kristina,T. Bruskotter Jeremy
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this article is to present a tool for assessing the sustainability knowledge of an undergraduate population.
Design/methodology/approach
– Multiple-choice questions were developed through soliciting expert input, focus groups, pilot testing, distribution via a large-scale online survey and analysis using item response theory.
Findings
– The final assessment consists of 16 questions from the environmental, economic and social domains, covering foundational concepts within the topic of sustainability.
Research limitations/implications
– This assessment represents an initial effort to quantify knowledge of the broad and abstract concept of sustainability. The authors plan to continue refining these questions to better differentiate between students with higher levels of knowledge and to replace those with answers that may change over time.
Practical implications
– With knowledge of sustainability concepts becoming increasingly included in institution-wide learning objectives, there is a growing demand for a way to measure progress in this area. Our assessment tool can easily be used (via a campus-wide survey or distributed at the classroom level) by institutions to gauge current levels of knowledge and track changes over time, as well as assess the effectiveness of courses and curricula at meeting sustainability knowledge goals.
Originality/value
– This assessment of sustainability knowledge is the first of its kind to include all three separate domains of sustainability, and we expect it to be useful across a variety of college and university contexts.
Subject
Education,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference21 articles.
1. Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education
(2012), “Version 1.2 technical manual: February 2012”, available at: http://www.aashe.org/files/documents/STARS/stars_1.2_technical_manual.pdf (accessed 24 January 2013).
2. Benn, S.
and
Dunphy, D.
(2009), “Action research as an approach to integrating sustainability in MBA programs: an exploratory study”, Journal of Management Education, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 276-295.
3. Brundtland Commission
(1987), Our Common Future, The Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
4. Cai, L.
,
Thissen, D.
and
du Toit, S.
(2011), IRTPRO 2.1 [computer software], Scientific Software International, Skokie, IL.
5. Connell, K.Y.H.
and
Kozar, J.M.
(2012), “Sustainability knowledge and behaviors of apparel and textile undergraduates”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 394-407.
Cited by
70 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献