Author:
Grunert Klaus G.,Fruensgaard Jeppesen Lisbeth,Risom Jespersen Kristina,Sonne Anne‐Mette,Hansen Kåre,Trondsen Torbjørn,Young James A.
Abstract
PurposeThis paper extends the concept of market orientation from the firm to the value chain level and seeks to develop empirically founded propositions on determinants of different levels of market orientation of value chains.Design/methodology/approachFour case studies on value chains within the areas of agribusiness and fisheries are conducted. For each value chain, desk research is combined with interviews with decision‐makers of all types of value chain members. Interview guidelines were derived from a conceptual model of potential determinants of value chain market orientation.FindingsDegree of market orientation of value chains is found to be related to degree of heterogeneity and dynamism of end‐users served, nature of chain relationships, regulations and prevailing mental models of decision‐makers. Short and balanced chains are believed to further upstream market orientation.Research limitations/implicationsThe results point at two areas, where additional research on market orientation is called for: a better conceptualization of market intelligence and theorizing on most cost effective ways of being market oriented, including implications for the distribution of market oriented activities among value chain members.Practical implicationsThe paper underlines the importance of managing channel relationships, up to and including vertical integration, when serving markets with high degrees of end‐user volatility.Originality/valueThis paper is the first empirical contribution to the market orientation literature employing a perspective encompassing the whole value chain.
Reference49 articles.
1. Avlonitis, G.J. and Gournaris, S. (1999), “Market orientation and its determinants: an empirical analysis”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 33 Nos 11/12, pp. 309‐566.
2. Baker, T.L., Simpson, P.M. and Siguaw, J.A. (1999), “The impact of supplier's perceptions of reseller market orientation on key relationship constructs”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 50‐7.
3. Casson, M. (1997), Information and Organization, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
4. Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds) (1994), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
5. DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 147‐60.
Cited by
109 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献