Language and thinking in organization studies

Author:

Chanlat Jean-François

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to clarify the relationship between language, thinking and society for explaining the degree of visibility of the French organizational studies (OS) production. Design/methodology/approach – This paper proposes a sociological analysis based on Bourdieu field to understand the variation of reception the French OS production have had among the Anglo-Saxon field. The paper aims to underline some key elements, which can explain the differences of reception experienced by the French OS scientists. The paper opted for a general review using historical data; reviews of OS literature; and Google scholar, Web of Science and major OS Journal data. Findings – The paper provides some evidence about how the degree of visibility of the French OS production is related to translation, cognitive and social resonance, producer place in the scientific network and relationship between the fields. It suggests that the degree of visibility is the result of a complex set of socio-cognitive schemes, social issues raised by the scholar and the place occupied by the researcher in the field. Originality/value – The paper brings interesting ideas concerning the international development of the OS field, the degree of visibility of diverse contributions coming from non-English speaking researchers, notably the French ones, and how the dialogue between different linguistic and social universes can be ameliorated.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management

Reference196 articles.

1. Alcadipani, R. and Reis Rosa, A. (2011), “From global management to global management: Latin American perspectives as a counter- dominant management epistemology”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 453-466.

2. Allard-Poesi, F. and Lollier, T. (2009), “Qu’est-ce que la critique en Sciences du Management? Que pourrait-elle être?”, Economies and Sociétés, Série KC, Etudes Critiques en Management, n°1, 1975-1999.

3. Aquino Alves, M. and Pozzebon, M. (2013), “How to resist linguistic domination and promote knowledge diversity”, RAE (Sao Paulo), Vol. 53 No. 6, pp. 629-633.

4. Amblard, H. , Bernoux, P. , Herreros, G. and Livian, Y-F. (1996, 2005), Les Nouvelles Approches Sociologiques des Organisations, Paris, Seuil.

5. Audet, M. (1986), “Le procès des connaissances de l’administration”, in Audet, M. , Malouin and J.-L. (Dir), La Production des Connaissances Scientifiques de L’administration, Les Presses de l’Université Laval, Ste Foy.

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. What we inherit and what we create. Making the case for an interpretive approach to societal cultures;International Journal of Cross Cultural Management;2024-01-17

2. Anthropocène, management et sociétés : pour une ouverture anthropologique des sciences de gestion;Revue internationale de psychosociologie et de gestion des comportements organisationnels;2023-11-02

3. Dialogues et perspectives autour de l'œuvre d'Yves-Frédéric Livian;Dialogues et perspectives autour de l'œuvre d'Yves-Frédéric Livian;2023-10-09

4. ‘Thinking About How We Think’: Using Bourdieu’s Epistemic Reflexivity to Reduce Bias in International Business Research;Management International Review;2023-03-22

5. Interkultureller Brückenbauer: Interview mit Christoph Barmeyer;Meilensteine der Interkulturalitätsforschung;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3