Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this article is to provide a tool to map the critical roles of intermediate organizations. To clarify the concept of intermediate organizations in a regional context, especially from the network dynamics point‐of‐view. Design/methodology/approach – Regional dynamics are presented as networks of production, development and innovation in the regional cluster. The intermediaries are divided into national, regional and local level actors. The roles of the intermediaries from the network dynamics point‐of‐view are then illustrated with examples from a case study in a medical technology cluster located in a sparsely inhabited area in Finland. Findings – According to the results of the case study, the regional intermediaries have the most important role in the creation and supporting of the network dynamics. The most critical roles include forming shared innovation strategies between the actors and attracting anchor tenants to the region. Research limitations/implications – The characteristics of the case region are discussed in a generic sense with the concepts of social capital and communities of practice. Practical implications – Conceptually, the article provides an approach to reducing the complexity of the regional networks to a more understandable level. The model provides a tool for the decision makers in a region to define the critical roles of the intermediaries from the network dynamics point‐of‐view. Originality/value – The novel approach introduced in this paper addresses three gaps in existing research: it helps to define the concept of an intermediary in a regional context; it shows that the intermediaries have a much broader role in a region than just knowledge transfer and that the roles of the intermediaries differ on national, regional and local levels.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Education
Reference36 articles.
1. Agrawal, A. and Cockburn, I. (2003), “The anchor tenant hypothesis: exploring the role of large, local, R&D‐intensive firms in regional innovation systems”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 21 No. 9, pp. 1227‐53.
2. Allee, V. (1999), “The art and practice of being a revolutionary”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 121‐31.
3. Allee, V. (2000), “Reconfiguring the value network”, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 21 No. 4.
4. Allee, V. (2002) “A value network approach for modeling and measuring intangibles”, paper presented at The Transparent Enterprise, The Value of Intangibles Conference, Madrid, November 25‐26.
5. Andriessen, D. (2004), Making Sense of Intellectual Capital, Butterworth‐Heinemann, Burlington, MA.
Cited by
77 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献