Knowledge management in the care for people with intellectual disabilities during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Author:

Nägele M. E.1,Bevelander K. E.1ORCID,Nies H. L. G. R.2,Embregts P. J. C. M.3,Biervliet N.1,Leusink G. L.1,Naaldenberg J.1

Affiliation:

1. Research Institute for Medical Innovation Radboudumc Nijmegen The Netherlands

2. Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen, Organization Sciences Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractThe study aimed to gain insight into knowledge management in the intellectual disabilities (ID) care sector during the COVID‐19 pandemic. We explored and described how knowledge producers, intermediaries, and knowledge users experienced knowledge management during this crisis situation, the responses to the specific knowledge needs in the ID‐care sector, and changes in roles and collaboration during this period. Twenty‐five individual in‐depth semi‐structured interviews were conducted with knowledge producers, intermediaries, and knowledge users in the Dutch ID‐care sector. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted. Three key themes were identified: (1) knowledge needs during the COVID‐19 pandemic, (2) experiences with knowledge management, and (3) roles and collaboration in knowledge management. There was an urgent need for specific ID‐related knowledge and how to translate available evidence for the general population into ID‐care settings. In knowledge management, the focus was on knowledge production and exchange, with validation and application receiving less attention. Within stakeholder groups, collaboration and knowledge exchange were intensified by existing or new knowledge infrastructures. Between stakeholder groups, knowledge producers and users created short lines to exchange needs and produce knowledge. This paper provides unique insights into knowledge management in the Dutch ID‐care sector during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Implications are discussed to improve future knowledge management processes. Support with knowledge validation and local knowledge infrastructures (complementary to centralized national knowledge infrastructures) help to assess the reliability and usefulness of knowledge and improve its use in practice during future pandemic‐related crisis situations.

Funder

ZonMw

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3