The nutritional and toxicological value of organic vegetables

Author:

Hoefkens Christine,Verbeke Wim,Aertsens Joris,Mondelaers Koen,Van Camp John

Abstract

PurposeThe present study aims to explore and compare consumer perception and scientific evidence related to food quality and food safety aspects of organic versus conventional vegetables.Design/methodology/approachPrimary data on consumer perception were gathered in 2006‐2007 through a consumer survey with Flemish adults (n=529) and compared with scientific evidence from literature. Consumers of organic and conventional vegetables were selected by means of a convenience sampling procedure. Subjects were asked to complete a self‐administered questionnaire concerning the perception of the nutritional and toxicological value of organic relative to conventional vegetables. Data processing and analysis included descriptive analysis (frequency distributions), data reduction (Cronbach's alpha test, factor analysis), bivariate analysis (correlations, t‐test, ANOVA) and multivariate analysis (stepwise multiple regression).FindingsIt was found that organic vegetables are perceived as containing less contaminants and more nutrients, and as such, being healthier and safer compared to conventional vegetables. However, not enough evidence is currently available in the literature to support or refute such a perception, indicating a certain mismatch between consumer perception and scientific evidence. The gap between perception and evidence is larger among older consumers with children. The perception is stronger when the consumption frequency is higher, but is independent of gender, place of residence (rural or urban), education and income level. Also non‐users, on average, perceive that organic vegetables have a nutritional and toxicological advantage over conventional vegetables.Research limitations/implicationsA non‐probability convenience sampling method was applied which limits generalisation of the findings beyond the sample characteristics.Originality/valueThis paper is original in comparing consumer perception and scientific facts related to both nutritional and safety aspects of organic versus conventional vegetables.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference37 articles.

1. Abando, L.L. and Rohner‐Thielen, E. (2007), “Different organic farming patterns within EU‐25 – an overview of the current situation”, Statistics in Focus, 69/2007, Eurostat, Luxembourg.

2. Amlinger, F. (1993), Handbuch der Compostierung (Report on handling manure), BMLF, Wien, p. 282.

3. Avery, D.T. (1998), “The hidden dangers of organic food”, American Outlook, Fall, pp. 19‐22.

4. Baker, B.P., Benbrook, C.M., Groth, E. and Benbrook, K.L. (2002), “Pesticide residues in conventional, integrated pest management (IPM)‐grown and organic foods: insights from three US data sets”, Food Additives and Contaminants, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 427‐46.

5. Bes‐Rastrollo, M., Martínez‐González, M.A., Sánchez‐Villegas, A., de la Fuente Arrillaga, C. and Martínez, J.A. (2006), “Association of fibre intake and fruit/vegetable consumption with weight gain in a Mediterranean population”, Nutrition, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 504‐11.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3