Assessing the ecological soundness of organic and conventional agriculture by means of life cycle assessment (LCA)
Author:
de Backer Eline,Aertsens Joris,Vergucht Sofie,Steurbaut Walter
Abstract
PurposeSustainable agriculture implies the ability of agro‐ecosystems to remain productive in the long‐term. It is not easy to point out unambiguously whether or not current production systems meet this sustainability demand. A priori thinking would suggest that organic crops are environmentally favourable, but may ignore the effect of reduced productivity, which shifts the potential impact to other parts of the food provision system. The purpose of this paper is to assess the ecological sustainability of conventional and organic leek production by means of life cycle assessment (LCA).Design/methodology/approachA cradle‐to‐farm gate LCA is applied, based on real farm data from two research centres. For a consistent comparison, two functional units (FU) were defined: 1ha and 1 kg of leek production.FindingsAssessed on an area basis, organic farming shows a more favourable environmental profile. These overall benefits are strongly reduced when the lower yields are taken into account. Related to organic farming it is therefore important that solutions are found to substantially increase the yields without increasing the environmental burden. Related to conventional farming, important potential for environmental improvements are in optimising the farm nutrient flows, reducing pesticide use and increasing its self‐supporting capacity.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is a cradle‐to‐farm gate LCA, future research can be expanded to comprise all phases from cradle‐to‐grave to get an idea of the total sustainability of our present food consumption patterns. The research is also limited to the case of leek production. Future research can apply the methodology to other crops.Originality/valueTo date, there is still lack of clear evidence of the added value of organic farming compared to conventional farming on environmental basis. Few studies have compared organic and conventional food production by means of LCA. This paper addresses these issues.
Subject
Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference120 articles.
1. Andersson, K. (1998), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Food Products and Production Systems, School of Environmental Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg. 2. Andersson, K. (2000), “Life cycle assessment of food products and production systems”, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 5, pp. 239‐48. 3. Andersson, K., Ohlsson, T. and Olsson, P. (1994), “Life‐cycle assessment (LCA) of food‐products and production systems”, Trends in Food Science and Technology, Vol. 5, pp. 134‐8. 4. Andersson‐Sköld, Y., Grennfelt, P. and Ayres, L.W. (1992), “Photochemical ozone creation potentials: a study of different concepts”, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 42, pp. 1152‐8. 5. Audsley, E., Alber, S., Clift, R., Cowell, S., Crettaz, P., Gaillard, G., Hausheer, J., Jolliet, O., Kleijn, R., Mortensen, B., Pearce, D., Roger, E., Teulon, H., Weidema, B. and van Zeijts, H. (1997), Harmonisation of Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Agriculture, Final Report of EU Concerted Action AIR3‐CT94‐2028, European Commission DG VI Agriculture, Brussels.
Cited by
148 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|