Exploring academics’ approaches to managing team assessment

Author:

Augar Naomi,Woodley Carolyn J,Whitefield Despina,Winchester Maxwell

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop an understanding of academics’ approaches to managing team assessment at an Australian University with a view to informing policy development and assessment design. Design/methodology/approach – The research was conducted using a single exploratory case study approach focussing on the team assessment approach of academics teaching in two colleges at an Australian University. A desktop audit of publicly available assessment policy from 38 Australian universities was conducted alongside a review of relevant college subject guides. The findings of this review framed a subsequent focus group and online survey of academic staff. Findings – Results suggest that staff have adopted highly diverse and idiosyncratic approaches to team assessment and have mixed views about varied approaches to managing and assessing teamwork. Findings identify a need for explicit guidance and professional development on designing, managing and grading team assessments. Institutional limits and criteria should be introduced to ensure a whole-of-course approach to developing teamwork skills and ensure students are not burdened with an excessive number of team assessment tasks in a degree. Research limitations/implications – The paper reports results from an exploratory case study at a single Australian University. As such, the results are not generalizable. Practical implications – The findings could inform guidelines, policies or support resources for designing team assessment tasks. Originality/value – The research explores a challenging area for academics: team assessment, which the research indicates is not currently adequately managed through university policy and procedure. The findings highlight options for universities to consider when developing policies and procedures to manage team assessment. The study also provides recommendations for academics to consider when developing and managing team assessment.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education

Reference38 articles.

1. Barrie, S.C. (2004), “A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy”, Higher Education Research & Development , Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 261-275.

2. Belbin, R.M. (1981), Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail , Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

3. BIHECC (2007), “Graduate employability skills”, available at: http://aces.shu.ac.uk/employability/resources/GraduateEmployabilitySkillsFINALREPORT1.pdf (accessed March 6, 2014).

4. Brannick, M.T. and Prince, C.W. (1997), “An overview of team performance measurement”, in Brannick, M.T. , Salas, E. and Prince, C.W. (Eds), Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications , Lawrence Erlbaum Assoicates, Mahwah, NJ.

5. Calderon, A. (2012), “High education in 2035 – the ongoing massification”, available at: www.academia.edu/2612867/High_Education_in_2035_The_Ongoing_Massification (accessed March 6, 2014).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3