Author:
van den Berg Herman A.,Kaur Vaneet
Abstract
Purpose
Fundamental classifications of knowledge may be measurable as factors of production and can reveal evidence of specialization between adjacent stages of production even in the presence of shared substantive knowledge. This study of aims to distinguish between, and empirically measure, relative reliance on fundamental classifications of knowledge at the individual level.
Design/methodology/approach
In this study, investment managers were asked in an online survey to weigh their relative reliance on tacit, codified and encapsulated knowledge in executing different investment strategies for diverse client groups. Measures of relative reliance on each fundamental classification of knowledge were derived from weights assigned by each survey respondent in a series of six questions.
Findings
Survey respondents provided reliable measures of their relative reliance on tacit, codified and encapsulated knowledge. Reliance on these fundamental classifications of knowledge is shown to differ between investment managers, depending on the investment strategies being used and client groups served. These differences were exhibited notwithstanding all the respondents sharing common substantive knowledge.
Research limitations/implications
Measures of relative reliance on three classifications of knowledge were based on self-reported ratings rather than on objectively observed phenomena, making them subject to measurement error. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to observe relative reliance on tacit, codified and encapsulated knowledge in future studies.
Originality/value
The divergences in relative reliance on the fundamentally different knowledge-based factors of production were found in the presence of jointly held substantive knowledge, suggesting that fundamental classifications of knowledge are measurable and can provide evidence of specialization.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management
Reference78 articles.
1. Tacit knowledge: some suggestions for operationalization;Journal of Management Studies,2001
2. Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes;Management Science,2003
3. FACTORTEST: Stata module to perform tests for appropriateness of factor analysis;Statistical Software Components,2003
4. Assessing construct validity in organizational research;Administrative Science Quarterly,1991
5. Birkinshaw, J. and Fey, C.F. (2001), “External sources of knowledge and performance in R&D organizations”, Working paper, London School of Business, London.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献