Countering a masculinity contest culture at work: the moderating role of organizational justice

Author:

Workman-Stark AngelaORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to test whether organizational justice (i.e. fair treatment) can mitigate the harmful effects of a “masculinity contest culture (MCC)” (i.e. norms, rituals and belief systems valorizing social dominance, work above other parts of life, physical strength and the avoidance of weakness).Design/methodology/approachThrough an analysis of secondary survey data collected from a Canadian police organization (N = 488), this study tested the moderating effects of organizational justice on the relationship between employee perceptions of their workplace as a masculinity contest, and a negative outcome variable, harassment.FindingsThe results of this study suggest that a MCC was significantly related to harassment, which in turn contributed to lower psychological wellbeing and increased turnover intentions. Independently, organizational justice moderated the effect of a MCC on harassment, suggesting that harassment is less prevalent in the workplace when there is a greater focus on treating all employees fairly.Originality/valueDespite the increase in both scholarly and practitioner interest in the effects of organizational cultures in which employees seek to maintain their own status at all costs, there has been little research examining the interactions of these harmful workplace cultures and the factors that might counter them. To the best of the author's knowledge, this is one of the rare studies to investigate possible interventions for harmful workplace cultures.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Public Administration,Applied Psychology

Reference100 articles.

1. Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much… or not enough: exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2013

2. Ambrose, M.L. and Arnaud, A. (2005), “Distributive and procedural justice: construct distinctiveness, construct interdependence, and overall justice”, in Greenberg, J. and Colquitt, J. (Eds), The Handbook of Organizational Justice, Erl-baum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 59-84.

3. The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: a test of mediation;Journal of Applied Psychology,2009

4. Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace;Academy of Management Review,1999

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3