Author:
Brier David James,Lebbin Vickery Kaye
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore drawing as an instructional method to teach information literacy.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors describe their work using Collaborative Speed Drawing with students in a collection of information literacy workshops for students enrolled in English 100 (first-year composition). Examples of student drawings from the workshops are examined to demonstrate the benefits and problems of this teaching method.
Findings
– Drawing is an excellent low-tech teaching method that helps students demonstrate their competence (or ignorance) of information literacy concepts. This method enables librarians to clarify, reinforce, challenge or change the pictures in student’s heads that underpin their understandings of library instruction and information literacy.
Practical implications
– This article provides ideas on how to use drawing in information literacy sessions or credit courses. Many of the ideas shared can be copied, enhanced or tailored to meet the needs of diverse lessons and students taking face-to-face instruction sessions.
Originality/value
– This is the first paper in library literature that focuses on and promotes drawing as a teaching method. In doing so, it challenges the high-tech instruction imperative and invites librarians to explicitly consider the images behind the words and concepts used in information literacy and library instruction sessions.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference14 articles.
1. Allen, N.
(2002),
Working with Words and Images: New Steps in an Old Dance
, Ablex Publishing, Westport, CT.
2. Baldwin, L.
and
Crawford, I.
(2010), “Art instruction in the botany lab: a collaborative approach”,
Journal of College Science Teaching
, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 26-31.
3. Bracke, P.J.
and
Dickstein, R.
(2002), “Web tutorials and scalable instruction: testing the waters”,
Reference Services Review
, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 330-337.
4. Detlor, B.
,
Booker, L.
,
Serenko, A.
and
Julien, H.
(2012), “Student perceptions of information literacy instruction: the importance of active learning”,
Education for Information
, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 147-161.
5. Francis, M.
(2012), “Using fun to teach rigorous content”,
Communications in Information Literacy
, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 151-159.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献