Belief in importance of information literacy abilities among undergraduates. Underlying factors and analysis of variance

Author:

Pinto Maria,Caballero David,Sales Dora,Segura Alicia

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the levels of belief in importance of information literacy abilities (BILAs) among an undergraduates’ sample. The aim is, on the one hand, to discover if there is a representative latent structure and, on the other hand, to know the existing differences according to external variables such as academic degree, course, gender and age. Design/methodology/approach A self-assessment questionnaire (IL-HUMASS) was applied to a sample of 749 students in English Studies, Translation and Interpreting and Education in Spain. Three types of statistical methods have been used to study the results: descriptive, factorial and analysis of variance. Findings Students’ levels of BILAs are acceptable but improvable. A framework of six underlying factors has been uncovered: evaluation-ethics, searching-using, technological processing, communication, dissemination and cognitive processing of the information. Significant differences on degree, course and gender have been found. Practical implications This paper is intended for a broad academic sector, including faculty, librarians and students in higher education. The BILAs construct helps to improve the diagnosis of the perception of the BILAs. Its representation through a reduced number of latent factors simplifies results and possible applications. The results show that variations in degree, course and gender are significant and should be taken into account. Originality/value Although much has been written about information literacy abilities, we still know little about the importance students place on them. The BILAs construct is intended to improve that knowledge.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference72 articles.

1. ACRL (2000), “Information literacy competency standards for higher education”, www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency (accessed 7 March 2020).

2. ACRL (2013), “Working group on intersections of scholarly communication and information”, Intersections of Scholarly Communication and Information Literacy, available at: www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/whitepapers/Intersections.pdf (accessed 7 March 2020).

3. ACRL (2016), “Framework for information literacy for higher education”, www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (accessed 7 March 2020).

4. Classroom learning communities’ impact on students in developmental courses;Journal of Developmental Education,2019

5. Learning information literacy through drawing;Reference Services Review,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3