Abstract
PurposeUnderpinned by the legitimacy perspective, this study explores how ride-hailing services are legitimized through resource exchange among the industry players. The authors explore the types of legitimacy involved in the legitimation process. The authors also examine the political games being played by the actors to attain legitimacy.Design/methodology/approachThis qualitative study involves thirty-one stakeholders/interviewees from emerging Asia. The interview data are supported by online documents and observations.FindingsThematic analysis shows that the industry players collaborate to achieve political, market, alliance, social, and investment legitimacy. The collaborations also legitimize industry players' existence through an eclectic mix of the numerous stakeholders' actions. This study shows how Dacin's proposed four types of legitimacy are coexisting and interconnected. It also highlights the neglected political legitimacy.Originality/valueThe findings guide the policymakers and ride-hailing operators experiencing competing requests to legitimize sustainable ride-hailing service development in urban cities.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation
Reference89 articles.
1. Low-cost innovation in emerging markets;Journal of Strategic Marketing,2015
2. Winning strategies for customer loyalty in the sharing economy: a mixed-methods study;Journal of Business Research,2020
3. Constructing mystery: empirical matters in theory development;Academy of Management Review,2007
4. The level matters: building capabilities for innovation and enterprise performance through customer involvement;European Journal of Innovation Management,2021
5. Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand service platform with impatient customers;Manufacturing and Service Operations Management,2019
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献