Abstract
Purpose
Most marketing practices assume that consumers will buy when prices are low. This assumption, however, may not always hold true. Employing equity theory and Veblen’s theory of the leisure class, this study tested two moderating effects to ascertain the relationship between perceived price and purchase intention. The purpose of this paper is threefold: first, to examine the relationship between perceived price and willingness to purchase; second, to discover the effects of two moderators (perceived price fairness and vanity) on this relationship; and third, to compare how these moderating effects differ by consumers’ brand familiarity.
Design/methodology/approach
A total of 287 usable data sets were collected from college students in the southeastern region of the USA.
Findings
The findings showed no negative relationship between perceived price and willingness to purchase. Only perceived price fairness was found to moderate the perceived price–purchase intention relationship. Furthermore, the moderating effect of price fairness was only confirmed in the high brand familiarity group, while the moderating effect of vanity was only confirmed in the low brand familiarity group.
Research limitations/implications
Generalization of the findings is cautioned because findings may vary by demographic backgrounds.
Practical implications
Since purchase intention increases when price is fair even though price is high, marketers should put efforts into promoting and creating the perception of fair price of their products and brands.
Originality/value
This study extends price perception research by incorporating two theories (equity theory and Veblen’s theory of the leisure class) that help further elaborate the relationship between perceived price and willingness to purchase.
Reference62 articles.
1. Price reduction strategy: effect of consumers’ price unfairness perceptions of past purchase on brand equity;Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics,2017
2. Toward an understanding of inequity;Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,1963
3. Adams, J.S. (1965), “Inequity in social exchange”, in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 267-299.
4. Dimensions of consumer expertise;Journal of Consumer Research,1987
5. Pricing of conspicuous goods: a competitive analysis of social effects;Journal of Marketing Research,2005
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献