Abstract
PurposeAdvances in information technology now permit the recording of massive and diverse process data, thereby making data-driven evaluations possible. This study discusses whether teachers’ information literacy can be evaluated based on their online information behaviors on online learning and teaching platforms (OLTPs).Design/methodology/approachFirst, to evaluate teachers’ information literacy, the process data were combined from teachers on OLTP to describe nine third-level indicators from the richness, diversity, usefulness and timeliness analysis dimensions. Second, propensity score matching (PSM) and difference tests were used to analyze the differences between the performance groups with reduced selection bias. Third, to effectively predict the information literacy score of each teacher, four sets of input variables were used for prediction using supervised learning models.FindingsThe results show that the high-performance group performs better than the low-performance group in 6 indicators. In addition, information-based teaching and behavioral research data can best reflect the level of information literacy. In the future, greater in-depth explorations are needed with richer online information behavioral data and a more effective evaluation model to increase evaluation accuracy.Originality/valueThe evaluation based on online information behaviors has concrete application scenarios, positively correlated results and prediction interpretability. Therefore, information literacy evaluations based on behaviors have great potential and favorable prospects.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference72 articles.
1. Instructor feedback: how much do students really want?;Journal of Marketing Education,2010
2. ACRL (2000), “Information literacy competency standards for higher education”, available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/standards.pdf (accessed 26 October 2019).
3. ACRL (2015), “Framework for information literacy for higher education”, available at: http://www.ala.org/arcl/standards/ils_recomm.pdf (accessed 26 October 2019).
4. Perspectives on information literacy: a framework for conceptual understanding;Information Research,2013
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献