Author:
Celoria Davide,Hemphill David
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine the practice of new principal coaching in schools from the coaches’ perspective.
Design/methodology/approach
– Six coaches of new principals were interviewed over a one-year period. Through the use of a qualitative, constant-comparative approach, the participants’ voices were used to discover their views. Data analysis employed emergent coding (Creswell, 2008; Denzin, 2005; Glaser and Strauss, 1998; Spradley, 1979). The study took place in the San Francisco Bay Area, a linguistically and ethnically diverse area, in the state of California, USA.
Findings
– Thematic analysis of interview data from principal coaches revealed a process-oriented focus within principal coaching as a primary finding. Process-oriented coaching, rather than specific, skill-focussed content, was the main mechanism coaches used to support new principals.
Research limitations/implications
– Findings are limited to the sample of principal coaches used for this analysis, although there are potential applications to similar school settings in other locations. Researchers are encouraged to examine new principal coaching in other contexts.
Practical implications
– The results of this inquiry point to the importance of process skills in new principal coaching, suggest the need for new approaches in principal mentoring programs, and call for further research on specific process tools in coaching to promote reflection and inquiry.
Originality/value
– The paper identifies process-oriented coaching as a valuable support mechanism for new principals, particularly during their first year in the role.
Subject
Education,Life-span and Life-course Studies
Reference42 articles.
1. Bennett, J.L.
(2006), “An agenda for coaching-related research: a challenge for researchers”, Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, Vol. 58 No. 4, pp. 240-249.
2. Bjorkeng, K.
,
Clegg, S.
,
Pitsis, A.
and
Rhodes, C.
(2008), “The new discipline of organizational coaching”, working paper, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, May.
3. Bloom, G.
,
Castagna, C.
and
Warren, B.
(2003), “More than mentors: principal coaching”, Leadership, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 20-23.
4. Boon, S.L.Z.
(1998), “Principalship mentoring in Singapore: who and what benefits”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 29-33.
5. Bozer, G.
and
Pirola-Merlo, A.
(2007), “Executive coaching effectiveness: a conceptual framework”, Monash Business Review, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 44-45.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献