Coaching from the coaches’ perspective: a process-oriented focus

Author:

Celoria Davide,Hemphill David

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the practice of new principal coaching in schools from the coaches’ perspective. Design/methodology/approach – Six coaches of new principals were interviewed over a one-year period. Through the use of a qualitative, constant-comparative approach, the participants’ voices were used to discover their views. Data analysis employed emergent coding (Creswell, 2008; Denzin, 2005; Glaser and Strauss, 1998; Spradley, 1979). The study took place in the San Francisco Bay Area, a linguistically and ethnically diverse area, in the state of California, USA. Findings – Thematic analysis of interview data from principal coaches revealed a process-oriented focus within principal coaching as a primary finding. Process-oriented coaching, rather than specific, skill-focussed content, was the main mechanism coaches used to support new principals. Research limitations/implications – Findings are limited to the sample of principal coaches used for this analysis, although there are potential applications to similar school settings in other locations. Researchers are encouraged to examine new principal coaching in other contexts. Practical implications – The results of this inquiry point to the importance of process skills in new principal coaching, suggest the need for new approaches in principal mentoring programs, and call for further research on specific process tools in coaching to promote reflection and inquiry. Originality/value – The paper identifies process-oriented coaching as a valuable support mechanism for new principals, particularly during their first year in the role.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education,Life-span and Life-course Studies

Reference42 articles.

1. Bennett, J.L. (2006), “An agenda for coaching-related research: a challenge for researchers”, Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, Vol. 58 No. 4, pp. 240-249.

2. Bjorkeng, K. , Clegg, S. , Pitsis, A. and Rhodes, C. (2008), “The new discipline of organizational coaching”, working paper, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, May.

3. Bloom, G. , Castagna, C. and Warren, B. (2003), “More than mentors: principal coaching”, Leadership, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 20-23.

4. Boon, S.L.Z. (1998), “Principalship mentoring in Singapore: who and what benefits”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 29-33.

5. Bozer, G. and Pirola-Merlo, A. (2007), “Executive coaching effectiveness: a conceptual framework”, Monash Business Review, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 44-45.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3