Detecting racial bias in algorithms and machine learning

Author:

Turner Lee Nicol

Abstract

Purpose The online economy has not resolved the issue of racial bias in its applications. While algorithms are procedures that facilitate automated decision-making, or a sequence of unambiguous instructions, bias is a byproduct of these computations, bringing harm to historically disadvantaged populations. This paper argues that algorithmic biases explicitly and implicitly harm racial groups and lead to forms of discrimination. Relying upon sociological and technical research, the paper offers commentary on the need for more workplace diversity within high-tech industries and public policies that can detect or reduce the likelihood of racial bias in algorithmic design and execution. Design/methodology/approach The paper shares examples in the US where algorithmic biases have been reported and the strategies for explaining and addressing them. Findings The findings of the paper suggest that explicit racial bias in algorithms can be mitigated by existing laws, including those governing housing, employment, and the extension of credit. Implicit, or unconscious, biases are harder to redress without more diverse workplaces and public policies that have an approach to bias detection and mitigation. Research limitations/implications The major implication of this research is that further research needs to be done. Increasing the scholarly research in this area will be a major contribution in understanding how emerging technologies are creating disparate and unfair treatment for certain populations. Practical implications The practical implications of the work point to areas within industries and the government that can tackle the question of algorithmic bias, fairness and accountability, especially African-Americans. Social implications The social implications are that emerging technologies are not devoid of societal influences that constantly define positions of power, values, and norms. Originality/value The paper joins a scarcity of existing research, especially in the area that intersects race and algorithmic development.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,Communication

Reference34 articles.

1. Abraham, R. (2017), “New York city passes bill to study biases in algorithms used by the city”, Motherboard, available at: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/xw4xdw/new-york-city-algorithmic-bias-bill-law (accessed 5 March 2018).

2. Airbnb (2018), “Airbnb’s nondiscrimination policy: our commitment to inclusion and respect”, Airbnb, available at: https://goo.gl/a9wDAS (accessed 5 March 2018).

3. Ananny, M. (2011), “The curious connection between apps for gay men and sex offenders”, The Atlantic, available at: www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/04/the-curiousconnection-between-apps-for-gay-men-and-sex-offenders/237340/ (accessed 5 March 2018).

4. Angwin, J. and Larson, J. (2016), “Bias in criminal risk scores is mathematically inevitable, researchers say”, Propublica, available at: https://goo.gl/S3Gwcn (accessed 5 March 2018).

5. Angwin, J., Tobin, A. and Varner, M. (2017), “Facebook (still) letting housing advertisers exclude users by race”, ProPublica, available at: https://goo.gl/Vk4jrs (accessed 5 March 2018).

Cited by 118 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3