Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to explore whether and how leaders’ attributes, understanding of and attitude towards quality assurance (QA) shape their practices towards effective implementation of QA in universities.
Design/methodology/approach
Using qualitative case study, the data were collected from nine institutional leaders purposively selected from two universities. The data, collected through semi-structured interviews, were analysed using thematic analysis technique.
Findings
The findings revealed that personal attributes of leaders such as understanding of QA, attitude towards QA and practices shape leadership style either as transformational or compliance leader. The transformational leader implements QA procedures with the intention of bringing improvement in teaching learning and research quality. In contrast, the compliance leaders are primarily concerned with implementation of QA procedures merely to fulfil the requirements of an external regulatory body.
Research limitations/implications
This study acknowledges that certain other factors (e.g. demographics, institutional policies or practices) might have an influence on leadership practices. Using the framework of this study, further quantitative and/or mixed methods research can expand by bringing more factors that can shape leadership practices.
Originality/value
The role of leadership is significant to the success of any university. A plethora of studies have reported various aspects of successful leadership in higher education (HE). However, in the changing nature of HE due to the emergence of formal QA, there is paucity of research that focusses on the role of leader’s attributes in the effective implementation of QA procedures.
Reference61 articles.
1. Ahmad, S. (2018), “Exploring higher education commission's quality assurance mechanisms for assuring quality in higher education at Khyber Pakhtunkhwa”, Unpublished master's dissertation, Aga Khan University, Karachi, available at: https://ecommons.aku.edu/theses_dissertations/844/
2. Transformational leadership and innovation: a comparison study between Iraq's public and private higher education;Studies in Higher Education,2016
3. Assuring quality/resisting quality assurance: academics’ responses to ‘quality’ in some Australian universities;Quality in Higher Education,2006
4. Institutional leadership and leeway – important elements in a national system of quality assurance and accreditation: experiences from a pilot study;Tertiary Education and Management,2004
5. Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review;Higher Education,2017
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献