Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to present a systematic review on service quality in higher education. It discusses about the latest opportunities and challenges facing higher educational institutions (HEIs) following the outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
Design/methodology/approach
The study relied on the grounded theory’s inductive reasoning to capture, analyze and synthesize the findings from academic and non-academic sources. The methodology involved a systematic review from Scopus-indexed journals, from intergovernmental and non-governmental policy documents, as well as from university ranking sites and league tables.
Findings
The comprehensive review suggests that HEIs can use different performance indicators and metrics to evaluate their service quality in terms of their resources, student-centered education, high-impact research and stakeholder engagement. Moreover, this paper sheds light about the impact of an unprecedented COVID-19 on higher education services.
Practical implications
During the first wave of COVID-19, the delivery of higher educational services migrated from traditional and blended learning approaches to fully virtual and remote course delivery. In the second wave, policy makers imposed a number of preventative measures, including social distancing and hygienic practices, among others, on HEIs.
Originality/value
This timely contribution has synthesized the findings on service quality and performance management in the higher education context. Furthermore, it investigated the effect of COVID-19 on higher education services. It deliberates on the challenges and responses in the short/medium term and provides a discussion on the way forward. In conclusion, it implies that HEI leaders ought to embrace online teaching models and virtual systems, as they are here to stay in a post-COVID-19 era.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference77 articles.
1. Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF;Marketing Intelligence and Planning,2006
2. Measuring service quality in higher education: three instruments compared;International Journal of Research and Method in Education,2006
3. The King Abdulaziz University (KAU) pandemic framework: a methodological approach to leverage social media for the sustainable management of higher education in crisis;Sustainability,2020
4. Trends in expert system development: a practicum content analysis in vocational education for over grow pandemic learning problems;Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology,2020
5. Service quality in postgraduate education;Quality Assurance in Education,2008
Cited by
83 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献