Author:
Flanagan Jennifer L.,Lewis Vance Johnson
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to gain better understanding of the attitudes toward those with tattoo(s) – by both those with and without tattoos – within the workplace. Specifically, this paper works to gain better understanding of attitudes toward those within specific employment and workplace groups.Design/methodology/approachThis study utilized a self-administered Likert scaled original survey through a combined random and snowball sampling method. Results were analyzed using quantitative statistical analysis based on responses to attitudinal questions and demographic factors.FindingsThe results of this study indicate that negative attitudes toward tattoos are diminishing, and that there is an ever shrinking gap in negative attitudes between those with and those without tattoos.Research limitations/implicationsWhile intended to be an exploratory exercise, this study may have been limited by the participant base. Even with a high number of responses, the random and snowball sampling of the participants may have resulted in clusters of data which may not be transferable across the population. Future studies should seek more closed collection of the data within specific organizations or controlled participant groups.Originality/valueThis study makes a new contribution to the literature as it is one of the first studies to specifically ask those with tattoos how they feel about others with tattoos. It is also one of the first academic articles, rather than journalistic, which explores attitudes toward tattoos within specific organizations.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Cultural Studies,Gender Studies
Reference87 articles.
1. Aidin, B. (2016), “Rethinking ink: How tattoos lost their cool”, The Telegraph: Lifestyle, January 23, available at: www.telegraph.co.uk/beauty/body/rethinking-ink-how-tattoos-lost-their-cool/ (accessed October 30, 2016).
2. Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook;Internet Research,2012
3. Human agency in social cognitive theory;American Psychologist,1989
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献