Forensic procedures for facial-composite construction

Author:

Fodarella Cristina,Kuivaniemi-Smith Heidi,Gawrylowicz Julie,Frowd Charlie D.

Abstract

Purpose – The paper provides a detailed description of standard procedures for constructing facial composites. These procedures are relevant to forensic practice and are contained in the technical papers of this special issue; the purpose of this paper is also to provide an expanding reference of procedures for future research on facial composites and facial-composite systems. Design/methodology/approach – A detailed account is given of the interaction between practitioner and witness for producing a facial composite. This account involves an overview of the Cognitive Interview (CI) and the Holistic CI (H-CI) techniques used to obtain a description of the face of an offender (target); the authors then describe how this information is used to produce a composite from five popular face-production systems: Sketch, PRO-fit, Electronic Facial Identification Technique (E-FIT), EvoFIT and EFIT-V. An online annex is also made available to provide procedural information for additional composite systems. Practical implications – The work is valuable to forensic practitioners and researchers as a reference for interviewing techniques (involving a CI or an H-CI) and using facial-composite systems. Originality/value – The authors provide an accessible, current guide for how to administer interviewing techniques and how to construct composites from a range of face-production systems.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. Association of Chief Police Officers (Scotland) (ACPO(S)) (2009), “Facial identification guidance”, Produced by the National Policing Improvement Agency, available at: www.acpo.police.uk/documents/crime/2009/200911CRIFIG01.pdf (accessed 7 October 2014).

2. Davies, G.M. (1983), “Forensic face recall: the role of visual and verbal information”, in Lloyd-Bostock, S.M.A. and Clifford, B.R. (Eds), Evaluating Witness Evidence , Wiley, Chichester, pp. 103-23.

3. Davies, G.M. and Christie, D.F.M. (1982), “An examination of some factors limiting composite production accuracy”, Journal of Applied Psychology , Vol. 67 No. 1, pp. 103-9.

4. Davis, R. , Sutherland, N.S. and Judd, B.R. (1961), “Information content in recognition and recall”, Journal of Experimental Psychology , Vol. 61 No. 5, pp. 422-9.

5. Ellis, H.D. , Shepherd, J.W. and Davies, G.M. (1980), “The deterioration of verbal descriptions of faces over different delay intervals”, Journal of Police Science and Administration , Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 101-16.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3