The contribution of the UNESCO biosphere reserve concept to urban resilience
Author:
Stanvliet Ruida,Parnell Susan
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to assess the contribution of the UNESCO biosphere reserve concept to urban resilience.Design/methodology/approachThe paper examines the challenges underpinning the problem of environmental degradation in cities. It then briefly considers available initiatives that can be implemented toward the realization of more sustainable cities. A case is made for the possible contribution of the UNESCO biosphere reserve concept as a useful urban management tool.FindingsUrban administrators have a range of tools to select from to support the design and management of sustainable cities. It is argued that the UNESCO biosphere reserve concept is potentially a very valuable tool, although, apart from academic studies, not truly tested in an urban context.Originality/valueBiological diversity is the very essence that sustains life on earth and forms the basis of quality living conditions, even within built‐up areas. Today, cities are facing the pressures of increasing populations and the effects thereof on the environment. The challenge facing cities is how to improve the quality of life of all city dwellers amidst the environmental challenge of dwindling natural resources. The paper looks at a number of initiatives available to city administrators in their quest to create liveable cities. It is perhaps timeous to research the potential applicability of the biosphere reserve framework as an urban tool toward more resilient, environmentally acceptable urban landscapes.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference75 articles.
1. Alfsen‐Norodom, C., Boehme, S.E., Clemants, S., Corry, M., Imbruce, V., Lane, B.D., Miller, R.B., Padoch, C., Panero, M., Peters, C.M., Rosenzweig, C., Solecki, W. and Walsh, D. (2004), “Managing the megacity for global sustainability: the New York metropolitan region as an urban biosphere reserve”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1023, pp. 125‐41. 2. Aquilar, A.G. and Ward, P.M. (2003), “Globalization, regional development, and mega‐city expansion in Latin America: analyzing Mexico City's peri‐urban hinterland”, Cities, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 3‐21. 3. Beall, J. (2002), “Globalization and social exclusion in cities. Framing the debate with lessons from Africa and Asia”, Environment & Urbanization, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 41‐51. 4. Bolund, P. and Hunhammar, S. (1999), “Ecosystem services in urban areas”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 293‐301. 5. Bradshaw, A.D. (2003), “Natural ecosystems in cities: a model for cities as ecosystems”, in Berkowitz, A.R., Nilon, C.H. and Hollweg, K.S. (Eds), Understanding Urban Ecosystems: A New Frontier for Science and Education, Institute of Ecosystem Studies/Springer‐Verlag, Millbrook/New York, NY, pp. 77‐94.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|