Is it possible to share tacit knowledge using information and communication technology tools?

Author:

Castaneda Delio Ignacio,Toulson Paul

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to determine whether it is possible to use information and communication technology (ICT) tools to share tacit knowledge. Few studies have considered this subject, and they have reported both the ineffectiveness and effectiveness of ICT tools for sharing tacit knowledge. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the participants comprised 217 knowledge workers from New Zealand and researchers who attended a knowledge management conference in the UK. In all, 59% of the sample was men and 41% women. The research model compared the scores of knowledge workers in two categories of ICT, those that allow dialogue and those that do not, in relation to knowledge sharing in organizations. The instrument used a Likert scale with five levels of response. Findings It was found that not all ICT technologies let tacit knowledge to be shared, but those ICT that facilitate dialogue, for example, text messaging and video conferences. Emails did not facilitate the exchange of tacit knowledge. Research limitations/implications It is suggested to replicate the study with different countries to evaluate the role of culture in the communication of tacit knowledge. Practical implications An implication for practitioners based on this study is that email should not be the preferred mode for transferring knowledge between an organization and their workers. This mode is adequate for the exchange of explicit knowledge, but it has a limited capacity for transferring tacit knowledge. Thus, organizations may increase the use of audio and video tools to transfer electronically tacit knowledge. Interaction or socialization may facilitate the understanding and internalization of tacit knowledge by workers. Originality/value This study contributed to understand the reason for contradictory results from previous research. ICT tools are effective to share tacit knowledge when they facilitate dialogue. Results also support practitioners about how to obtain more effective exchange of tacit knowledge in organizations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference70 articles.

1. Knowledge sharing for pediatric pain management via web 2.0 framework;Studies in Health Technology and Informatics,2009

2. To share or not to share: an exploratory review of knowledge management systems and knowledge sharing in multinational corporations,2016

3. The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration;The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2003

4. The semantic web;Scientific American,2006

5. Knowledge sharing: the role of psychological variables in leaders and collaborators;Suma Psicológica,2015

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Knowledge sharing in the era of Covid-19: a bibliometric analysis using scopus and web-of-science (WoS);Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication;2023-10-23

2. Knowledge Management in Improving the College of Health’s Performance;Proceedings of the 7th Global Conference on Business, Management, and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2022);2023-09-29

3. Online meeting tools, tacit knowledge sharing and entrepreneurial behaviours among knowledge workers during COVID-19;Knowledge Management Research & Practice;2023-09-25

4. Sarcastic emojis: why don’t you understand?;Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication;2023-09-05

5. Determinants of BPMS use for knowledge management;Journal of Knowledge Management;2023-06-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3