Sarcastic emojis: why don’t you understand?

Author:

Kusaila Daniel,Gerhart Natalie

Abstract

Purpose Technology-enabled communication used in workplace settings includes nuanced tools such as emojis, that are interpreted differently by different populations of people. This paper aims to evaluate the use of emojis in work environments, particularly when they are used sarcastically. Design/methodology/approach This research uses a survey method administered on MTurk. Overall, 200 participants were included in the analysis. Items were contextualized from prior research and offered on a seven-point Likert scale. Findings Females are better able to understand if an emoji is used sarcastically. Additionally, older employees are more capable of interpreting sarcasm than younger employees. Finally, understanding of emojis has a negative relationship with frustration, indicating that when users understand emojis are being used sarcastically, frustration is reduced. Research limitations/implications This research is primarily limited by the survey methodology. Despite this, it provides implications for theory of mind and practical understanding of emoji use in professional settings. This research indicates emojis are often misinterpreted in professional settings. Originality/value The use of emojis is becoming commonplace. The authors show the use of emojis in a professional setting creates confusion, and in some instances can lead to frustration. This work can help businesses understand how best to manage employees with changing communication tools.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference64 articles.

1. Sarcasm in organizations: a review and research agenda;مجلة البحوث المالية والتجارية,2020

2. Alcorn, C. (2021), “These are the 3 most misunderstood emojis on the planet [WWW document]”, CNN Bus, available at: www.cnn.com/2021/07/15/tech/emoji-most-popular-study/index.html (accessed 23 May 2022).

3. Words and everything else: verbal and nonverbal cues in social interpretation;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1977

4. A systematic review of emoji: current research and future perspectives;Frontiers in Psychology,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3