E‐service quality: comparing the perceptions of providers and customers

Author:

Stiakakis Emmanouil,Georgiadis Christos K.

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to identify the similarities and differences between the perspectives of providers and customers regarding the important dimensions and attributes of e‐service quality (e‐SQ).Design/methodology/approachTen criteria are proposed for assessment of e‐SQ in both business‐to‐business (B2B) and business‐to‐consumer (B2C) transactions. Confirmatory factor analysis confirms the validity of grouping these criteria into five proposed dimensions. The e‐SQ dimensions and criteria are then ranked in terms of their importance by a survey of respondents from small and medium‐sized enterprises with experience in conducting e‐business in Greece. The results are compared with selected surveys of customers' perceptions from the literature.FindingsThe results indicate that the providers' perceptions are in agreement with customers' perceptions with regard to e‐SQ dimensions, but not with regard to specific criteria (items) within those dimensions. The study also finds that providers have similar perceptions of the importance of the suggested e‐SQ criteria in B2B and B2C electronic transactions.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings should be generalised with care if extrapolated to other socio‐cultural settings and specific industries.Practical implicationsManagers should recognise that there might be differences between their views of e‐SQ and those of their customers.Originality/valueThis is one of the few studies to have focused on the perceptions of providers in assessing e‐SQ.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management

Reference52 articles.

1. Auer, C. and Petrovic, O. (2004), “E‐measurement: an integrated methodology for measuring the performance of e‐services”, International Journal of Electronic Business, Vol. 2 No. 6, pp. 583‐602.

2. Barnes, S.J. and Vidgen, R.T. (2002), “An integrative approach to the assessment of e‐commerce quality”, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 114‐27.

3. Bauer, C. and Scharl, A. (2000), “Quantitative evaluation of web site content and structure”, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 31‐43.

4. Bauer, H.H., Falk, T. and Hammerschmidt, M. (2006), “eTransQual: a transaction process‐based approach for capturing service quality in online shopping”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59 No. 7, pp. 866‐75.

5. Bauer, H.H., Grether, M. and Leach, M. (2000), “Building customer relations over the internet”, Ecommerce Research Forum, available at: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu (accessed June 26, 2006).

Cited by 43 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3