Abstract
The unstructured employment interview is one of the most popular selection tools among employers and applicants alike. Although past research has shed light on some explanations for practitioners’ preferences for unstructured methods, less is known about the reasons for their popularity among applicants. One reason might be that applicants overestimate recruiters’ intuitive abilities to make judgments about applicant characteristics based on resumes and interviews. The results of this study (N = 345) suggest that recruiters are perceived as much better than laypeople at making judgments about applicants based on resume screening and interviews, and that faith in recruiters’ intuition predicts process favorability for unstructured employment interviews. Moreover, this association remained significant when accounting for attitudes to structured interviews, perceived recruiter expertise, and attitudes to holistic versus mechanic methods in general. The results suggest that overestimation of recruiters’ intuitive expertise may help explain why many people prefer unstructured selection methods.
Publisher
Stockholm University Press
Subject
Psychology (miscellaneous),Applied Psychology,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Reference37 articles.
1. Applicant reactions in selection: Comprehensive meta-analysis into reaction generalization versus situational specificity;International Journal of Selection and Assessment,2010
2. Fairness reactions to personnel selection methods: An international comparison between the Netherlands, the United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and Singapore;International Journal of Selection & Assessment,2008
3. The use of person-organization fit in employment decision making: An assessment of its criterion-related validity;Journal of Applied Psychology,2006
4. Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS);Personnel Psychology,2001
5. Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1996