Lifetime years married held steady for men with a BA degree since 1960 but dropped to lowest level since 1880 for men without a BA

Author:

Schwartz Christine R.1ORCID,González-Velastín Rodrigo1ORCID,Li Anita1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706

Abstract

Trends in life expectancy and marriage patterns work together to determine expected lifetime years married. In 1880, adult life expectancy was short and marriages were more likely to end by death than divorce. Since then, although there have been substantial life expectancy gains in adulthood, marriage has been increasingly delayed or forgone and cohabitation and divorce are far more prevalent. Whether adults today can expect to spend more or fewer years married than in the past depends on the relative magnitude of changes in mortality and marriage. We estimate trends in men’s expected lifetime years married (and in other marital statuses) from 1880 to 2019 and by bachelor’s degree (BA) status from 1960 to 2019. Our results show a rise in men’s expected lifetime years married between 1880 and the Baby Boom era and a subsequent fall. There are large and growing differences by BA status. Men with a BA have had high and relatively stable expected lifetime years married since 1960. For men without a BA, expected lifetime years married has plummeted to lows not seen among men since 1880. Cohabitation accounts for a substantial fraction, although not all, of these declines. Our results demonstrate how increasing inequality in both life expectancy and marriage patterns combine to amplify educational differences in lifetime experiences of coresidential partnerships.

Funder

HHS | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference60 articles.

1. Demographic Foundations of Family Change

2. A. J. Cherlin, Labor’s Love Lost: The Rise and Fall of the Working-Class Family in America (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 2014).

3. Patriarchy, Power, and Pay: The Transformation of American Families, 1800–2015

4. P. Krugman, “Why we’re in a new gilded age” in After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality, H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong, M. Steinbaum, Eds. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2017), pp. 60–72.

5. D. Grusky, T. Kricheli-Katz, The New Gilded Age: The Critical Inequality Debates of Our Time (Stanford University Press, 2012).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3