Density of immunogenic antigens does not explain the presence or absence of the T-cell–inflamed tumor microenvironment in melanoma

Abstract

Melanoma metastases can be categorized by gene expression for the presence of a T-cell–inflamed tumor microenvironment, which correlates with clinical efficacy of immunotherapies. T cells frequently recognize mutational antigens corresponding to nonsynonymous somatic mutations (NSSMs), and in some cases shared differentiation or cancer–testis antigens. Therapies are being pursued to trigger immune infiltration into non–T-cell–inflamed tumors in the hope of rendering them immunotherapy responsive. However, whether those tumors express antigens capable of T-cell recognition has not been explored. To address this question, 266 melanomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were categorized by the presence or absence of a T-cell–inflamed gene signature. These two subsets were interrogated for cancer–testis, differentiation, and somatic mutational antigens. No statistically significant differences were observed, including density of NSSMs. Focusing on hypothetical HLA-A2+binding scores, 707 peptides were synthesized, corresponding to all identified candidate neoepitopes. No differences were observed in measured HLA-A2 binding between inflamed and noninflamed cohorts. Twenty peptides were randomly selected from each cohort to evaluate priming and recognition by human CD8+T cells in vitro with 25% of peptides confirmed to be immunogenic in both. A similar gene expression profile applied to all solid tumors of TCGA revealed no association between T-cell signature and NSSMs. Our results indicate that lack of spontaneous immune infiltration in solid tumors is unlikely due to lack of antigens. Strategies that improve T-cell infiltration into tumors may therefore be able to facilitate clinical response to immunotherapy once antigens become recognized.