Affiliation:
1. Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
2. Department of Political Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
3. Department of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
Abstract
Generative AI that can produce realistic text, images, and other human-like outputs is currently transforming many different industries. Yet it is not yet known how such tools might influence social science research. I argue Generative AI has the potential to improve survey research, online experiments, automated content analyses, agent-based models, and other techniques commonly used to study human behavior. In the second section of this article, I discuss the many limitations of Generative AI. I examine how bias in the data used to train these tools can negatively impact social science research—as well as a range of other challenges related to ethics, replication, environmental impact, and the proliferation of low-quality research. I conclude by arguing that social scientists can address many of these limitations by creating open-source infrastructure for research on human behavior. Such infrastructure is not only necessary to ensure broad access to high-quality research tools, I argue, but also because the progress of AI will require deeper understanding of the social forces that guide human behavior.
Funder
John F. Templeton Foundation
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference80 articles.
1. K. Sayash, A. Narayanan, AI Snake Oil (Princeton University Press, 2024).
2. Why open-source generative AI models are an ethical way forward for science
3. A. Vaswani et al. Attention is all you need. arXiv [Preprint] (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 (Accessed 20 December 2023).
4. The debate over understanding in AI’s large language models
5. Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献