Widespread use of National Academies consensus reports by the American public

Author:

Hicks Diana1,Zullo Matteo12,Doshi Ameet13ORCID,Asensio Omar I.14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332

2. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303

3. Princeton University Library, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544

4. Institute for Data Engineering & Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30308

Abstract

Significance Advocates for open access argue that people need scientific information, although they lack evidence for this. Using Google’s recently developed deep learning natural language processing model, which offers unrivalled comprehension of subtle differences in meaning, 1.6 million people downloading National Academies reports were classified, not just into broad categories such as researchers and teachers but also precisely delineated small groups such as hospital chaplains, veterans, and science fiction authors. The results reveal adults motivated to seek out the most credible sources, engage with challenging material, use it to improve the services they provide, and learn more about the world they live in. The picture contrasts starkly with the dominant narrative of a misinformed and manipulated public targeted by social media.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference32 articles.

1. T. Nichols, The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters (Oxford University Press, 2017).

2. Work and personal e-mail use by university employees: PIM practices across domain boundaries

3. National Research Council, A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas (National Academies Press, 2012).

4. Institute of Medicine, The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health (National Academies Press, 2011).

5. Emergent linguistic structure in artificial neural networks trained by self-supervision

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3