Abstract
Trust in science increases when scientists and the outlets certifying their work honor science’s norms. Scientists often fail to signal to other scientists and, perhaps more importantly, the public that these norms are being upheld. They could do so as they generate, certify, and react to each other’s findings: for example, by promoting the use and value of evidence, transparent reporting, self-correction, replication, a culture of critique, and controls for bias. A number of approaches for authors and journals would lead to more effective signals of trustworthiness at the article level. These include article badging, checklists, a more extensive withdrawal ontology, identity verification, better forward linking, and greater transparency.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference30 articles.
1. C. Funk , B. Kennedy , Public confidence in scientists has remained stable for decades. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/03/22/public-confidence-in-scientists-has-remained-stable-for-decades/. Accessed 22 March 2019.
2. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
3. Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: Prevalence and causal factors;George;Int. J. Clin. Oncol.,2016
4. Cancer reproducibility project releases first results;Baker;Nature,2017
5. Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献