Natural selfish genetic elements should not be defined as gene drives-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Natural selfish genetic elements should not be defined as gene drives

Published:2022-08-15 Issue:34 Volume:119 Page:
ISSN:0027-8424
Container-title:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

Author:

Wells Mark A.¹^ORCID,Steinbrecher Ricarda A.¹

Affiliation:

1. EcoNexus, Oxford OX4 9BS, United Kingdom

Funder

Marin Community Foundation

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Link

https://pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2201142119

Reference10 articles.

1. Opinion: Standardizing the definition of gene drive

2. Synthetic gene drive: between continuity and novelty

3. M. Dolezel S. Samson M. Otto M. Engelhard W. Zughart “Gene drive organisms: Implications for the environment and nature conservation” (Umweltbundesamt - Environment Agency Austria 2019).

4. K. H. Redford T. M. Brooks N. B. W. Macfarlane J. S. Adams “Genetic frontiers for conservation: An assessment of synthetic biology and biodiversity conservation: Technical assessment” (International Union for Conservation of Nature 2019).

5. A CRISPR–Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Engineered and natural gene drives: mechanistically the same, yet not same in kind;Nature Communications;2023-09-26

2. A gene drive is a gene drive: the debate over lumping or splitting definitions;Nature Communications;2023-03-29