Internal variability and forcing influence model–satellite differences in the rate of tropical tropospheric warming

Author:

Po-Chedley Stephen1ORCID,Fasullo John T.2ORCID,Siler Nicholas3ORCID,Labe Zachary M.4ORCID,Barnes Elizabeth A.4ORCID,Bonfils Céline J. W.1,Santer Benjamin D.56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550

2. Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80305

3. College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331

4. Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523

5. Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095

6. Physical Oceanography Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543

Abstract

Climate-model simulations exhibit approximately two times more tropical tropospheric warming than satellite observations since 1979. The causes of this difference are not fully understood and are poorly quantified. Here, we apply machine learning to relate the patterns of surface-temperature change to the forced and unforced components of tropical tropospheric warming. This approach allows us to disentangle the forced and unforced change in the model-simulated temperature of the midtroposphere (TMT). In applying the climate-model-trained machine-learning framework to observations, we estimate that external forcing has produced a tropical TMT trend of 0.25 ± 0.08 K⋅decade −1 between 1979 and 2014, but internal variability has offset this warming by 0.07 ± 0.07 K⋅decade −1 . Using the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2) large ensemble, we also find that a discontinuity in the variability of prescribed biomass-burning aerosol emissions artificially enhances simulated tropical TMT change by 0.04 K⋅decade −1 . The magnitude of this aerosol-forcing bias will vary across climate models, but since the latest generation of climate models all use the same emissions dataset, the bias may systematically enhance climate-model trends over the satellite era. Our results indicate that internal variability and forcing uncertainties largely explain differences in satellite-versus-model warming and are important considerations when evaluating climate models.

Funder

U.S. Department of Energy

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3