Female peers in small work groups enhance women's motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering

Author:

Dasgupta Nilanjana,Scircle Melissa McManus,Hunsinger Matthew

Abstract

For years, public discourse in science education, technology, and policy-making has focused on the “leaky pipeline” problem: the observation that fewer women than men enter science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields and more women than men leave. Less attention has focused on experimentally testing solutions to this problem. We report an experiment investigating one solution: we created “microenvironments” (small groups) in engineering with varying proportions of women to identify which environment increases motivation and participation, and whether outcomes depend on students’ academic stage. Female engineering students were randomly assigned to one of three engineering groups of varying sex composition: 75% women, 50% women, or 25% women. For first-years, group composition had a large effect: women in female-majority and sex-parity groups felt less anxious than women in female-minority groups. However, among advanced students, sex composition had no effect on anxiety. Importantly, group composition significantly affected verbal participation, regardless of women’s academic seniority: women participated more in female-majority groups than sex-parity or female-minority groups. Additionally, when assigned to female-minority groups, women who harbored implicit masculine stereotypes about engineering reported less confidence and engineering career aspirations. However, in sex-parity and female-majority groups, confidence and career aspirations remained high regardless of implicit stereotypes. These data suggest that creating small groups with high proportions of women in otherwise male-dominated fields is one way to keep women engaged and aspiring toward engineering careers. Although sex parity works sometimes, it is insufficient to boost women’s verbal participation in group work, which often affects learning and mastery.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference40 articles.

1. National Academies (2010) Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5 (National Academies, Washington, DC)

2. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2013) Science and engineering degrees: 1966–2010. Available at nsf.gov/statistics/nsf13327/. Accessed November 20, 2014

3. National Center for Education Statistics, National Center for Education Statistics (2013) Digest of Education Statistics. Washington, DC. Available at nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_318.10.asp. Accessed November 20, 2014

4. Higher Education Research Institute (2013) Survey of the American freshman: Special tabulations. Los Angeles, CA. Available at www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/pdf/tab2-8.pdf. Accessed November 20, 2014

5. National Science Foundation (2009) Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2009. Available at www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/. Accessed November 20, 2014

Cited by 203 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3