On the Science of Education Design Studies

Author:

Shavelson Richard J.1,Phillips D. C.2,Towne Lisa3,Feuer Michael J.4

Affiliation:

1. Stanford University, School of Education, 485 Lasuen Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-3096; richs @stanford.edu. His research interests include social science research methods and science teaching, learning, and assessment

2. Stanford University, 485 Lasuen Mall, Stanford, CA 94302-3096; . His research areas of interest include philosophical and methodological issues in social science and educational research and constructivist positions in psychology, sociology, and science (including science education)

3. The Center for Education of the National Research Council of the National Academies, 500 5th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20001; . Her current interests include the conduct, use, and infrastructure of education research

4. The Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education at the National Research Council of the National Academies, 500 5th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20001; . His research interests include public policy, social science theory and practice and education

Abstract

The authors argue that design studies, like all scientific work, must comport with guiding scientific principles and provide adequate warrants for their knowledge claims. The issue is whether their knowledge claims can be warranted. By their very nature, design studies are complex, multivariate, multilevel, and interventionist, making warrants particularly difficult to establish. Moreover, many of these studies, intended or not, rely on narrative accounts to communicate and justify their findings. Although narratives often purport to be true, there is nothing in narrative form that guarantees veracity. The authors provide a framework that links design-study research questions as they evolve over time with corresponding research methods. In this way, an integration can be seen of research methods focused on discovery with methods focused on validation of claims.

Publisher

American Educational Research Association (AERA)

Subject

Education

Cited by 216 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Developing Hidden Talent: An Exploratory Study of Advanced Math Curriculum Implementation and Its Effects on Young Mathematically Promising English Learners;Journal for the Education of the Gifted;2024-09-12

2. A University-School District Partnership to Develop Well Connected©: An Integrated Student Wellness Approach in High Schools;School Mental Health;2024-07-31

3. Inhalt;Horizontale Wissensproduktion;2024-05-06

4. Frontmatter;Horizontale Wissensproduktion;2024-05-06

5. Bibliografie;Horizontale Wissensproduktion;2024-05-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3