Author:
Bernstein Steven,van der Ven Hamish
Abstract
AbstractBest practices are increasingly used to govern a range of global issues. Yet, the rise of global governance through best practices has received scant attention in the International Relations literature. How do best practices differ from other modes of governance? How are they constructed? And to what end? We offer a novel conceptualisation of best practices as a unique mode of global governance principally distinguished by basing claims of political authority on existing practices. Belying their apolitical terminology, best practices in global governance are purposively constructed by political actors to steer targeted actors toward desired ends. We illustrate the characteristics of governance through best practices with reference to state and non-state global governance initiatives in a wide range of issue areas, ranging from finance and development to human rights and the environment, and through an in-depth case study of the ISEAL Alliance, a disseminator of best practices for transnational sustainability standard-setters. We find that governance through best practices has both positive and negative consequences. While it offers a pragmatic approach to global governance under conditions of fragmentation and polycentricity, it can also mask underlying power dynamics and political agendas and therefore requires ongoing critical scrutiny.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
69 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Best Practices in Security Sector Reform: EU Efforts to Change Ukraine's Public Order Policing;Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding;2024-07
2. The ethics of voluntary ethics standards;Business and Society Review;2024-03
3. Transnational Regulation;The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law;2024-02-01
4. Comparative Law beyond the State;The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law;2024-02-01
5. Transnational economic activism and private regulatory power;Journal of International Economic Law;2023-09-01