Abstract
In this comment on Dion, Sumner, and Mitchell’s article “Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields,” I explore the role of changes in the disparities of citations to work written by women over time. Breaking down their citation data by era, I find that some of the patterns in citations are the result of the legacy of disparity in the field. Citations to more recent work come closer to matching the distribution of the gender of authors of published work. Although the need for more equitable practices of citation remains, the overall patterns are not quite as bad as Dion, Sumner, and Mitchell conclude.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference13 articles.
1. Running Backwards and in High Heels
2. The Responsible Electorate
3. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
4. Women don’t ask? Women don’t say no? Bargaining and service in the political science profession;Mitchell;PS: Political Science and Politics,2013
5. Gender in the journals: Publication patterns in political science;Teele;PS: Political Science and Politics,2017
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献